非政府组织协同参与农村公共管理创新实践研究——以北京辛庄村创客联盟为例

Research on the Innovative Practice of Non-governmental Organizations' Collaborative Participation in Rural Public Management: A Case Study of Maker Alliance in Xinzhuang Village, Beijing

  • 摘要: 在农业现代化与乡村治理转型背景下,非政府组织如何嵌入农村公共管理并发挥协同治理作用,已成为重要议题。本文以北京市昌平区兴寿镇辛庄村创客联盟为案例,构建“主体—过程—结果”(SPO)分析框架,分析非政府组织协同参与农村公共管理的实践机制与治理成效。研究发现:创客联盟由早期环保小组逐步发展为制度化组织,并与村委会、运营公司、服务中心共同形成“四位一体”的协同治理结构;在运行过程中,联盟通过党建引领、资源链接、平台搭建和线上线下联动等方式,发挥了政策传导、资源整合与关系协调等功能;治理成效在个体、社区、系统等层面得以体现。同时,联盟发展仍面临资源依赖、精英依赖和权责边界模糊等现实约束。据此,从理顺政社关系、完善组织治理和深化协同机制等方面提出优化发展路径。

     

    Abstract: Against the backdrop of agricultural modernization and rural governance transformation, how non-governmental organizations embed themselves in rural public management and fulfill their collaborative governance functions has emerged as a critical research topic. Taking the Maker Alliance in Xinzhuang Village, Xingshou Town, Changping District, Beijing as a case study, this paper constructs a 'Subject-Process-Outcome (SPO)' analytical framework to examine the practical mechanisms and governance effects of non-governmental organizations' collaborative participation in rural public management. The findings show that the Maker Alliance has gradually evolved from an early spontaneous environmental group into an institutionalized entity, forming a stable 'four-in-one' collaborative governance structure with the village committee, professional operation enterprise and community public service center. In operation, the alliance performs core functions including policy transmission, resource integration and multi-stakeholder coordination via Party building leadership, cross-sector resource brokering, platform construction and integrated online-offline interaction. Its governance outcomes are systematically manifested at individual, community and institutional levels. Meanwhile, the long-term development of the alliance still faces practical constraints such as external resource dependence, elite reliance and ambiguous boundaries of rights and responsibilities. Accordingly, this paper proposes optimized development paths from three dimensions: rationalizing government-society relations, improving organizational governance and deepening multiparty collaborative mechanisms.

     

/

返回文章
返回