西南地区县域城乡融合发展的测度、诊断与类型格局研究

A Study on Measurement, Diagnosis and Typological Pattern of County-level Urban-rural Integration Development in Southwest China

  • 摘要: 县域城乡融合是系统观审视地域分工与提升发展效能的重要举措,也是指导小城镇发挥比较优势的重要支撑。本研究以西南地区为案例,构建“基础—动力—结果”评价框架,运用组合赋权法与障碍解析模型,对川黔滇三省400个县域的城乡融合水平进行量化评估,并开展障碍因素识别与类型格局解析。研究发现:区域融合水平总体低位攀升,呈现动力与基础维度滞后、结果维度突出的结构失衡;空间呈“核心—边缘”梯度分异。障碍因素高度集中于动力与基础维度,构成现阶段关键瓶颈。基于融合水平与障碍程度的交叉分类,县域类型呈现中心集聚、廊道依赖与地形约束的空间分异特征。严重滞后型集中于边缘山区,占比42.50%,受地形刚性制约;中间过渡型与发展受阻型沿交通廊道呈带状分布;矛盾突出型2处,暴露增长规模与发展质量不同步风险。研究表明,结果导向的发展路径易掩盖内生动力短板,需转向畅通城乡融合循环系统。

     

    Abstract: County-level urban-rural integration is an essential approach to systematically reorganize territorial labor division and improve comprehensive development efficiency, and also provides important underpinning for guiding small towns to exert their comparative advantages. Taking Southwest China as the research scope, this paper constructs an evaluation framework of 'foundation-dynamics-outcome'. By adopting the combined weighting method and obstacle degree analysis model, it quantitatively evaluates the urban-rural integration level of 400 counties in Sichuan, Guizhou and Yunnan provinces, identifies key restrictive factors, and explores their typological differentiation characteristics. The results show that the overall urban-rural integration level in the study area presents an upward trend from a low starting level, accompanied by prominent structural imbalance: the foundation and dynamics dimensions obviously lag behind the outcome dimension, and the spatial distribution shows an evident core-periphery gradient pattern. Restrictive factors are mainly concentrated in the foundation and dynamics dimensions, which constitute the core bottlenecks restricting high-quality development at this stage. Based on the cross-classification of integration level and obstacle intensity, county types present spatial differentiation features of central agglomeration, corridor attachment and terrain restriction. Severely underdeveloped counties are predominantly distributed in peripheral mountainous areas, accounting for 42.50% of the total and being deeply trapped by topographical constraints. Transitional and development-restricted counties show zonal distribution along transportation corridors. A small number of counties with prominent developmental contradictions face the risk of decoupling between growth scale and development quality. This study argues that the outcome-dominated development model tends to mask the deficiencies of endogenous driving forces. It is necessary to optimize the development logic and smooth the systemic circulation of county-level urban-rural integration.

     

/

返回文章
返回