县域尺度浙江省农村人口外流的时空变化特征及驱动机制

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Mechanisms of Rural Population Outflow in Zhejiang Province at the County Level

  • 摘要: 文章以浙江省县域为单元,整合2000—2020年户籍、常住人口与外流率数据(82个样本),运用Gini、GMI描述空间分布与集聚,结合外流类型—转移矩阵刻画演化,并在Z-score标准化后构建OLS、SLM、SEM识别驱动机制(OLS n=75;SLM/SEM在Queen权重下剔除孤立单元n=73)。结果表明:外流呈明显“两阶段”特征: 2000—2009年缓慢流失,2010—2020年加速流失;空间格局体现“户籍趋均—常住趋集—外流由集转散”。在控制协变量后,人均固定资产投资显著正向、人均GDP显著负向,揭示“增量促流—存量吸附”的差异效应;乡村从业占比显著负向、人均耕地面积负向且在空间模型中边际显著,支持“生计锚定”;城镇化率在空间模型中显著为正,植被覆盖指数显著为负。模型比较显示SEM的AIC/BIC最优、SLM的对数似然略高,空间参数ρλ未达显著水平,表明存在弱空间联动而非强烈外溢。据此提出“增量促流—存量吸附—生计锚定—弱空间联动”的可检验机制链,并据以给出“优化流”政策组合:核心承载区同步扩容产业与公共服务,持续外流的山地边缘县强化通勤与产业补链,转型过渡县支持人才回流与远程就业、完善基本公共服务。

     

    Abstract: Using county-level data for Zhejiang Province (2000—2020), this study integrates hukou and resident population and outflow rates (82 counties) to depict spatio-temporal dynamics and identify drivers of rural population outflow. Spatial distribution and concentration are measured with Gini and GMI, and the evolution of outflow types is traced via a transition matrix. After Z-score standardization, we estimate OLS, spatial lag (SLM), and spatial error (SEM) models (OLS n=75; SLM/SEM n=73 under Queen contiguity with island units removed). Findings reveal a clear two-stage pattern-slow loss (2000—2009) followed by accelerated loss (2010—2020)-and a spatial configuration of 'hukou equalization-resident concentration-outflow shifting from concentrated to dispersed'. Conditional on covariates, per-capita fixed-asset investment is positively associated with outflow, while GDP per capita is negatively associated, evidencing a differentiated mechanism of 'incremental development promotes outflow, stock development retains population'. Rural employment share is significantly negative, and per-capita arable land is negative and marginally significant in spatial models, supporting a livelihood-anchoring effect; urbanization is positive and significant in spatial models, whereas vegetation cover is significantly negative. Model comparison shows SEM attains the lowest AIC/BIC and SLM a slightly higher log-likelihood; spatial parameters (ρ, λ) are not significant, indicating weak spatial interdependence rather than strong spillovers. We synthesize a testable mechanism chain-incremental pull, stock retention, livelihood anchoring, and weak spatial linkage-and propose an 'optimize mobility' policy mix: expand industry platforms and basic public services in core hubs, strengthen commuting links and industrial complementarity in persistently outflowing mountain-edge counties, and support talent return, remote work, and public-service baselines in transition counties.

     

/

返回文章
返回