Research on Village inside City Transformation Strategy for Migrant Population Inclusion: Taking the Yangjia Arch in Hangzhou as an Example
-
摘要: 随着我国城市发展由土地城镇化迈向人本城镇化,城中村外来人口市民化问题日显迫切和重要。然而,外来人口在当前如火如荼的城中村改造中普遍面临着居住权丧失、公共服务剥夺、空间隔离加剧、归属感缺乏等不包容困境。为此,本文引入包容性理念,构建外来人口包容性城中村改造策略框架,提出包容性城中村改造应以住房供应包容、公共服务包容、交通出行包容、社区关系包容、治理主体包容为目标,在具体规划策略要素实施时遵循公平、共享、平等、健康、可持续5大原则。在此基础上,文章以浙江省杭州市西湖区杨家牌楼城中村为例,厘清外来人口所面临的非包容性问题,探讨其包容性规划响应机制,以期为城中村改造提供有益参考。Abstract: As China's urban development moves from land urbanization to people-oriented urbanization, the problem of the urbanization of the migrant population in villages inside city has become increasingly urgent and important. However, in the current transformation of villages inside city, the migrant population is generally facing the dilemma of incompatibility such as the loss of residency rights, the deprivation of public services, the intensification of spatial isolation, and the lack of belonging. To this end, this paper introduces the concept of inclusive philosophy and constructs a strategic framework for the transformation of inclusive villages inside city for migrant population. It points out that the transformation should aim at inclusive housing supply, public service inclusion, transportation and travel inclusion, community relations inclusion, and governance subject inclusion, and follow the five principles of inclusive concept fairness, sharing, equality, safety, health and sustainability when implementing specific planning strategy elements. Based on this, the article takes the Yangjia Arch Village inside city, in Xihu District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province as an example to clarify the non-inclusive problems faced by the migrant population and explore its inclusive planning response mechanism, in order to provide a useful reference for the transformation of urban villages.
-
[1] 大卫·科兹, 孟捷.大卫·科兹和孟捷对话:新自由主义与中国[J].政治经济学评论,2016,7(6):211-224. [2] 李倩, 许晓东.城中村改造研究热点及趋势[J].城市问题, 2018(8):22-30. [3] 贺雪峰.城中村改造:亟待包容性破题的人地矛盾[J].上海城市管理,2014,23(2):47-51. [4] 苏海威, 胡章, 李荣.拆除重建类城市更新的改造模式和困境对比[J].规划师,2018,34(6):123-128. [5] 姚之浩, 田莉, 范晨璟, 等.基于公租房供应视角的存量空间更新模式研究——厦门城中村改造的规划思考[J].城市规划学刊,2018(4):88-95. [6] 赵静, 马晓亚, 朱莹.外来人口聚居社区公共服务设施供需特征及影响因素——以南京殷巷社区为例[J].现代城市研究, 2017(3):14-21. [7] 刘贵文,张欢,汪熹子,等.城中村改造对原住民职住关系负向影响研究——以太原市为例[J].工程管理学报,2019,33(6):139-143. [8] 陈凯仁, 龙茂乾, 李贵才.超大城市城中村外来人口归属感研究——以深圳上步村为例[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(5):64-68,74. [9] 崔岩.流动人口心理层面的社会融入和身份认同问题研究[J].社会学研究,2012,27(5):141-160,244. [10] 韩勇, 贺萌琳, 高军波, 等.空间隔离视角下中西方城市社会排斥研究述评[J].人文地理,2020,35(6):26-34. [11] Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Leaving No One Behind:The Imperative of Inclusive Development:2016 Report on the World Social Situation[R].New York:United Nations,2016:17-22. [12] Garrett J K, White M P, Huang J, et al.Urban Blue Space and Health and Wellbeing in Hong Kong:Results from a Survey of Older Adults[J].Health & Place,2019,55(1):100-110. [13] 庞娟.融合视角下城市非正规空间的包容性治理研究[J].探索,2017(6):146-152. [14] 孙小峰.包容性发展视域下城中村治理机制与模式研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2021. [15] 王海龙.建构新型城市化时期包容性城中村改造模式[J].北京社会科学,2014(3):75-85. [16] 叶裕民.特大城市包容性城中村改造理论架构与机制创新——来自北京和广州的考察与思考[J].城市规划,2015,39(8):9-23. [17] 罗吉,黄亚平,赵丽元,等.城市低收入群体二元居住需求与住房供给研究——基于微观实证调查[J].城市规划,2015,39(3):86-93. [18] 田莉.从城市更新到城市复兴:外来人口居住权益视角下的城市转型发展[J].城市规划学刊,2019(4):56-62. [19] 叶裕民, 张理政, 孙玥, 等.破解城中村更新和新市民住房"孪生难题"的联动机制研究——以广州市为例[J].中国人民大学学报,2020,34(2):14-28. [20] 杨菊华.中国流动人口的社会融入研究[J].中国社会科学, 2015(2):61-79,203-204. [21] 汪明峰, 程红, 宁越敏.上海城中村外来人口的社会融合及其影响因素[J].地理学报,2015,70(8):1243-1255. [22] 张译匀, 于涛方.包容性、韧性与舒适性:《新城市议程》 对我国城市发展的启示[J].规划师,2021,37(7):5-12. [23] 黄幸, 刘玉亭.中国绅士化研究的本土实践:特征、议题与展望[J].人文地理,2021,36(3):5-14,36. [24] 贾生华, 郑文娟, 田传浩.城中村改造中利益相关者治理的理论与对策[J].城市规划,2011,35(5):62-68. [25] 李润国, 赵青, 王伟伟.新型城镇化背景下城中村改造的问题与对策研究[J].宏观经济研究,2015(8):41-47,75. [26] 马新文.阿玛蒂亚·森的权利贫困理论与方法述评[J].国外社会科学,2008(2):69-74. [27] 蔡荣鑫."包容性增长"理念的形成及其政策内涵[J].经济学家,2009(1):102-104. [28] 何明俊.包容性规划的逻辑起点、价值取向与编制模式[J].规划师,2017,33(9):5-10. [29] 约翰·M·利维.现代城市规划(第五版)[M].张景秋,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003. [30] 刘强, 王勇, 周凯琦.逆转与嬗变:城中村认知与改造研究演进[J].现代城市究,2019(8):41-48.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 135
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0