Study on Influencing Factors of Public Space Vitality of Mountainous Traditional Villages in Southern Zhejiang
-
摘要: 浙南山地传统村落公共空间有着显著的生态与景观资源优势,由于山地的阻隔使其受城镇化、现代化侵蚀相对较小,在一定程度上保存更加原真性的村落文化。但同时山地传统村落公共空间受地形、区位等要素影响,其活力缺失问题愈加严重。本文以浙江省丽水市山地传统村落为例,通过问卷调查获取公共空间活力的影响因素,并构建结构方程模型来探究空间活力影响因素的相互作用关系。研究发现,对于浙南山地传统村落公共空间活力的影响强弱关系为:“景观与生态” >“公共设施服务” >“产业与人文” >“空间尺度特征”,其中“景观与生态”与“空间尺度特征”通过其他要素间接影响公共空间活力,“公共设施服务”与“产业与人文”直接影响公共空间活力。最后,根据分析结果提出了相应的空间活力提升策略。Abstract: The public space of traditional mountain villages in southern Zhejiang has significant advantages in ecological and landscape resources. The isolation of mountains makes it relatively less eroded by urbanization and modernization, and preserves more authentic local culture to a certain extent. But at the same time, the public space of mountain traditional villages is affected by terrain, location, and other factors, and its lack of vitality is more serious. Taking mountainous traditional villages in Lishui, Zhejiang as example, this paper obtains the influencing factors of public space vitality through questionnaire survey and constructs a structural equation model to explore the interaction between the influencing factors of space vitality. The main results are as follows:the relationship between the impact on the vitality of public space in mountainous traditional villages in southern Zhejiang shows ‘landscape and ecology’ > ‘public facilities service’ > ‘industry and humanities’ > ‘spatial scale characteristics’, among which ‘landscape and ecology’ and ‘spatial scale characteristics’ indirectly affect the vitality of public space, and ‘public facilities service’ and ‘industrial humanities’ directly affect the vitality of public space. Finally, according to the analysis results, this paper puts forward the corresponding strategies to improve the space vitality.
-
[1] 鲁可荣, 程川.传统村落公共空间变迁与乡村文化传承——以浙江三村为例[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 38(6):22-29. [2] 阿龙多琪, 马航, 杨彪.2000年以来我国公共空间活力研究进展[J].现代城市研究, 2020(10):123-130. [3] 任彬彬, 忻益慧.冀北地区特色村寨公共空间活力评价因素[J].地域研究与开发, 2018, 37(3):138-141, 147. [4] 包亚芳, 孙治, 宋梦珂, 等.基于居民感知视角的浙江兰溪传统村落公共空间文化活力影响因素研究[J].地域研究与开发, 2019, 38(5):175-180. [5] 李跃亮.浙南山地村落活态保护的实践与思考——以浙江省松阳县为例[J].浙江社会科学, 2016(8):143-150, 161. [6] 曲秋香.探析村落公共空间的乡土性设计[J].设计, 2015(15):138-139. [7] 吴必虎.基于乡村旅游的传统村落保护与活化[J].社会科学家, 2016(2):7-9. [8] 王思明, 伽红凯.中国传统村落记忆:浙江卷[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社, 2018:244-265. [9] 阿龙多琪.景区依托型村落公共空间活力评价及空间优化研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2017. [10] 刘朵朵, 李志新.皖南传统村落街巷转角空间特色研究[J].小城镇建设, 2019, 37(7):45-52.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483. 2019.07.007. [11] 罗德胤, 孙娜, 付敔诺.村落保护和乡村振兴的松阳路径[J].建筑学报, 2021(1):1-8. [12] C·亚历山大.建筑的永恒之道[M].赵冰, 译.北京:知识产权出版社, 2004. [13] 蒋涤非.城市形态活力论[M].南京:东南大学出版社, 2007. [14] 罗萍嘉, 郑祎, 王雨墨, 等.旅游开发影响下的"对立与共生"——传统村落公共空间"二元拼贴"研究[J].现代城市研究, 2020(12):9-17. [15] 程瑶.旅游发展环境下传统村落保护与开发研究——以松阳杨家堂村为例[J].建筑与文化, 2021(5):159-161.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 107
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0