Research on the Relevance and Mutual Construction of Tourist Behavior and Village Space: A Case Study of Huitong Village in Zhuhai City
-
摘要: 在传统村落的旅游发展中,村落空间承载着历史文化与人文底蕴,游客行为承载着社会物质文化需求与消费意向,应聚焦村落空间与游客行为的互动关系,使二者相互契合,更好地激发空间的经济、文化、社会效益。本文以广东省珠海市香洲区唐家湾镇会同村为例,运用“行为—空间”关联性理论及其方法体系探究游客行为与村落空间之间的互联互构。通过行为注记等调研方法对村落重要空间的特征与游客行为分布进行统计与总结,进一步对行为集聚量差异较大的空间进行对比,探寻空间对行为的客观限定机制、行为对空间的主观选择机制。最后提出“游客行为—村落空间”互构策略,降低空间先决条件对行为的限制,强化空间后天利用对行为的适应,从而推动乡村空间的适游性建设。Abstract: In the tourism development of traditional villages, the village space implies historical and cultural characteristics, and tourist behavior implies society's material and cultural needs and consumption intentions. The study should focus on the interactive relationship between the village space and the tourist behavior, in order to reach a high fit with each other and the economic, cultural and social benefits of space are better stimulated. Taking Huitong Village in Zhuhai City as an example, this paper uses the relevance theory of behavior and space to explore the interconnection and mutual construction between tourist behavior and village space. The characteristics of the village's important spaces and the distribution of tourists' behavior are summarized through behavior mapping and other research methods, and then the spaces with large differences in behavior agglomeration are compared to explore the objective restriction mechanism of space on behavior and the subjective selection mechanism of behavior on space. Finally, strategies of mutual construction between tourist behavior and village space are proposed to reduce the restriction of space prerequisites on behavior, and strengthen the adaptation of space utilization to behavior, so as to make the rural space more suitable for tourism.
-
[1] 褚冬竹, 马可, 魏书祥."行为-空间/时间"研究动态探略——兼议城市设计精细化趋向[J]. 新建筑,2016(3):92-98. [2] 柴彦威, 谭一洺, 申悦, 等. 空间-行为互动理论构建的基本思路[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(10):1959-1970. [3] 王志强, 胡一可, 王垒. 空间-行为关联视角下的社区街道空间微更新研究——以天津市西北角回民社区为例[J]. 风景园林,2018,25(10):98-103. [4] 梁晨,曾橙.基于环境行为分析的城中村公共空间更新——以华侨大学厦门校区兑山村为例[J]. 新建筑,2018(6):108-111. [5] 张杨, 何依. 从关联到互构:近人尺度视角下城市街区的"空间-行为"互动研究——基于《清明上河图》的量化分析[J]. 城市发展研究,2020,27(10):2,37,64-70. [6] 李芝也, 韩海潮."空间-行为互动"视角下乡村公共空间形成机制模型建构[J]. 城市建筑,2019,16(16):88-93. [7] 周芃. 国家历史文化名城研究中心历史街区调研——广东珠海唐家湾镇会同村[J]. 城市规划,2005,29(4):98. [8] 冀晶娟, 肖大威. 传统村落民居再利用类型分析[J]. 南方建筑,2015(4):48-51. [9] 李和平, 张邹. 浅析环境心理学对古镇格局和活力复兴的影响[J]. 小城镇建设,2009,27(10):69-73.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002- 8439.2009.10.015. [10] 王维仁. 不只是地域主义:乡建自述四书十二帖[J]. 建筑学报,2018(12):1-9. [11] 唐孝祥. 简论岭南汉族民居建筑的适应性[J]. 南方建筑, 2008(5):37-39. [12] 刘孝蓉, 胡明扬. 基于产业融合的传统农业与乡村旅游互动发展模式[J]. 贵州农业科学,2013,41(3):221-222. [13] 北川富朗. 乡土再造之力:大地艺术节的10种创想[M]. 欧小林, 译. 北京:清华大学出版社,2015:2. [14] 杨贵庆. 乡村人居文化的空间解读及其振兴[J]. 西部人居环境学刊,2019,34(6):102-108. [15] 戴碧婷. 宗族地方认同:一种以血缘和文化为纽带的地方认同[D]. 福州:福建师范大学,2018:63.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 175
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0