Activation Model of Rural Architectural Heritage from the Perspective of Community Building
-
摘要: 快速城镇化背景下,乡土建筑遗产面临着同乡村社区逐渐割裂的困境。随着国家政策引导,乡村社区化逐渐成为我国现阶段城乡统筹发展的趋势。文章梳理了国内外社区营造视角下建筑遗产活化的发展历程,论述了社区营造作为建筑遗产活化介入路径的可行性;通过对国内以社区营造为理念的活化案例进行剖析,将活化过程中包括总体策划、组织方式、资源分配方式、资金投入方式、规划设计方式及运营使用方式等一系列实施方法进行归纳,提炼出政府统筹引导型、村民自发组织型、社会组织推进型三种活化模式,并分析对比其运行特征,进而对不同活化模式的组织协调、资金投入、权责分配和教育培养等实践运行机制进行了剖析,明确了规划师和建筑师在具体落实工作中需要侧重的设计策略和实施方法,以期将社区营造理念有效贯彻到活化实践当中。Abstract: Under the background of rapid urbanization, rural architectural heritage is facing the dilemma of gradual separation from rural communities. With the guidance of national policy, rural community has gradually become the trend of urban and rural overall development in China. The development process of architectural heritage activation from the perspective of community construction at home and abroad is sorted out and the feasibility of community construction as an intervention path of architectural heritage activation is discussed. Through the case of domestic community construction as the concept of activation, the activation process included in the overall planning, organization, resource allocation, capital investment, planning and design methods and operating way of using a series of implementation methods are summarized, such as extracting the government guide the demonstration, the villagers organize, three activation patterns such as push social organization, analysis and comparison of its operation characteristics. Furthermore, the practical operation mechanism of different activation modes, such as organization and coordination, capital investment, power and responsibility distribution, education and training, are analyzed, and the implementation methods and design strategies that planners and architects need to focus on in the specific implementation work are clarified, in order to effectively implement the concept of community building into the activation practice.
-
Key words:
- rural community /
- community building /
- rural architectural heritage /
- activation patterns
-
[1] 陈志华,赵巍.由《关于乡土建筑遗产的宪章》引起的话[J]. 时代建筑,2000(3):20-24. [2] 吴志宏, 吴雨桐, 石文博. 内生动力的重建:新乡土逻辑下的参与式乡村营造[J]. 建筑学报,2017(2):108-113. [3] 贺雪峰. 新乡土中国[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2013. [4] 罗德胤. 让乡村遗产回归百姓生活[J]. 新建筑,2016(4):18-22. [5] 马良灿. 农村社区内生性组织及其"内卷化"问题探究[J]. 中国农村观察,2012(6):12-21,92. [6] 赵民."社区营造"与城市规划的"社区指向"研究[J]. 规划师,2013,29(9):5-10. [7] 胡澎. 日本"社区营造"论——从"市民参与"到"市民主体"[J]. 日本学刊,2013(3):119-134,159-160. [8] 潘玥. 对日本妻笼宿保存与再生计划的思考[J]. 建筑遗产,2017(2):8-23. [9] 魏成. 政策转向与社区赋权:台湾古迹保存的演变与经验[J]. 国际城市规划,2011,26(3):91-96. [10] 罗晶, 单军. 台湾古迹保存的发展与地方意识论述[J]. 建筑学报,2013(4):22-27. [11] 中共福州市委宣传部, 永泰县人民政府. 嵩口模式[M]. 福州:福建人民出版社,2018. [12] 胡卫亮. 松阳县历史文化村落保护发展的实践与思考[J]. 新农村,2014(7):14-15. [13] 诸葛坤亨. 诸葛村古村落保护模式[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2007(2):46-50. [14] 耿羽, 赖仰恩. 传统村镇活态文化保护的闽台合作机制——以福州嵩口镇社区营造为例[J]. 福州党校学报,2019(6):65-70. [15] 杨莹. 浅论村庄社区关联与乡村遗产管理[C]//中国民族建筑研究会. 新农村建设中乡土建筑保护暨永嘉楠溪江古村落保护利用学术研讨会论文集. 北京:中国民族建筑研究会, 2007:2072-2076.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 334
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0