Rural Reconstruction of Traditional Village from the Perspective of Differential Mode of Association
-
摘要: 传统村落是世代聚村而居的熟人社会,是以农业生产方式为基础的村民生活共同体。本文从维护传统村落共同体稳定发展的主导性社会关系模式—差序格局入手,分析这一模式得以构建的原生因素及其在当代语境下的嬗变,认为当前传统村落面临的核心困境是主导性社会关系模式解构和共同体失落,根源在于农村人口迁移和农业生产凋敝;指出传统村落乡土重建需要重聚松散的乡土社会关系结构,重塑独立的生产生活空间;并提出通过农业创新发展与人力资本培育、人居环境改善与乡土建筑保护、日常生活传承与旅游微介入、基层组织治理与礼俗秩序重建等策略,唤醒传统村落的内生式发展机制,恢复传统村落自我发展的活力。Abstract: The traditional village is an acquaintance society where people live together from generation to generation. It is a living community based on agricultural production mode. This paper starts with the differential mode of association, the dominant social relationship model for maintaining the stable development of traditional village community. By analyzing the original factors of the construction of this social relationship and its evolution in the contemporary context. It is considered that the core dilemma faced by the current traditional villages is the deconstruction of the dominant social relationship model and the loss of the community, which is rooted in the migration of rural population and the decline of agricultural production; It is pointed out that the reconstruction of traditional villages needs to reunite the loose local social relationship structure and reshape the independent production and living space; It also puts forward strategies to awaken the endogenous development mechanism of traditional villages and restore the vitality of self-development of traditional villages through agricultural innovation and development and cultivation of human capital, improvement of living environment and protection of local buildings, inheritance of daily life and micro intervention of tourism, governance of grass-roots organizations, and reconstruction of etiquette and customs order.
-
Key words:
- traditional village /
- differential mode of association /
- community /
- rural reconstruction
-
[1] 斐迪南·滕尼斯. 共同体与社会:纯粹社会学的基本概念[M]. 林荣远, 译. 北京:商务印书馆, 1999:54-66. [2] 蔡杨. 历史语境中"差序格局"的逻辑与走向——以《乡土中国》和《乡土重建》为中心的再解读[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2019(5):113-120. [3] 刘军民, 庄袁俊琦. 传统村落文化脱域与保护传承研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2017, 24(11):6-9. [4] 费孝通.乡土中国[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2012:37-48. [5] 阎云翔. 差序格局与中国文化的等级观[J]. 社会学研究, 2006(4):201-213. [6] 翟学伟. 再论"差序格局"的贡献、局限与理论遗产[J]. 中国社会科学, 2009(3):152-158. [7] 卜长莉."差序格局"的理论诠释及现代内涵[J]. 社会学研究, 2003(1):21-29. [8] 刘奇. 中国乡土社会正在发生十大转变[J]. 管理观察, 2019(6):14-15. [9] 谢地, 李梓旗. 城镇化与乡村振兴并行背景下的城乡人口流动:理论、矛盾与出路[J]. 经济体制改革, 2020(3):39-45. [10] 李路路, 李汉林. 中国的单位组织——资源、权利与交换[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出社, 2000:2-3. [11] 李培林. 中国社会结构转型对资源配置方式的影响[J]. 中国社会科学, 1995(1):70-82. [12] 赵霞. 传统乡村文化的秩序危机与价值重建[J]. 中国农村观察, 2011(3):80-86. [13] 费孝通. 乡土重建[M]. 长沙:岳麓书社, 2011:56. [14] 尤海涛, 马波, 陈磊. 乡村旅游的本质回归:乡村性的认知与保护[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(9):158-162. [15] 中国新闻网. 痛失翁丁之后谁来重建?学界专家相聚云端反思研讨[EB/OL]. (2021-03-07)[2021-05-31]. http://www.chinanews.com/cul/2021/03-07/9426810.shtml. [16] 曹军锋. 乡村振兴与村落共同体重建[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2020(1):68-74. [17] 蒲娇, 唐娜. 冯骥才传统村落保护话语[M]. 天津:天津大学出版社, 2021:113. [18] 刘士林, 于炜, 苏晓静, 等. 再不保护就悔之莫及了——长三角"中国传统村落"调查报告[N]. 光明日报, 2015-02-27(5). [19] 郑玲玉. 社会治理共同体视域下提升基层社会治理水平对策探究[J]. 中共乐山市委党校学报(新论), 2021, 23(2):56-60.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 287
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0