县级国土空间总体规划中的灾害风险评估探析——以阿合奇县为例

杨选梅; 张宇

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2021.08.011

县级国土空间总体规划中的灾害风险评估探析——以阿合奇县为例

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2021.08.011

杨选梅,
张宇

1. 同济大学建筑与城市规划学院;
2. 江苏华新城市规划市政设计研究院有限公司

详细信息

作者简介:
杨选梅,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院博士研究生,高级城乡规划师,注册城乡规划师;张宇,江苏华新城市规划市政设计研究院有限公司城乡规划所规划师。

中图分类号: TU984.11+6
计量
- 文章访问数: 297
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-04-29

Discussions on Disasters Risk Assessment of the County-level Territorial Master Planning: A Case Study of Aheqi County

摘要

摘要: 文章以“减少灾害风险”为目标，从全球变化、区域压力、当地社会生态条件等方面构建县级国土空间总体规划中灾害风险评估的概念框架；借鉴欧洲国家半定量风险评估方法，设计简明易操作的评估流程，并应用于新疆克孜勒苏柯尔克孜自治州阿合奇县的研究，有三点发现：（1）空间相关性是确定灾害风险评估范畴的关键；（2）生态极重要区由于其人口低暴露，在空间上与高灾害风险区表现出异质性；（3）城镇建设适宜区和农业生产适宜区存在高灾害风险。
- 县级国土空间规划 /
- 灾害风险评估 /
- 双评价 /
- 半定量评估方法 /
- 阿合奇县
Abstract: Taking ‘disaster risk reduction’ as the goal, this paper constructs the conceptual framework of disaster risk assessment from the aspects of global change, regional pressure and local social and ecological conditions. Based on the semi-quantitative risk assessment methods of European countries, a concise and easyoperated assessment process was created and applied to Aheqi County. There are three findings:(1) Spatial correlation is the key to determine the scope of disaster risk assessment. (2) Ecologically extreme important areas show spatial heterogeneity with high-hazard risk areas due to their low population exposure. (3) Urban construction appropriate areas and agricultural production appropriate areas have high disaster risk.
- county-level territorial spatial planning /
- disaster risk assessment /
- double evaluations /
- semiquantitative research method /
- Aheqi County

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	阚凤敏. 联合国引领国际减灾三十年:从灾害减灾到灾害风险管理(1990-2019)[J]. 中国减灾,2020(3):54-59.
[2]	UNISDR. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030[R],2015.
[3]	王新哲, 钱慧, 刘振宇. 治理视角下县级国土空间总体规划定位研究[J]. 城市规划学刊,2020(3):65-72.
[4]	European Environmental Agency. Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe:an indicator-based report[R],2017.
[5]	Field C B, Barros V R, Change I P C. IPCC, 2014:Climate change 2014:Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A:global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[6]	Gill J C, Malamud B D. Anthropogenic processes, natural hazards, and interactions in a multi-hazard framework[J]. EarthScience Reviews, 2017,166(1):246-269.
[7]	Eleonora Pilone, Micaela Demichela, Gabriele Baldissone. The multi-risk assessment approach as a basis for the territorial resilience[J].Sustainability, 2019(11):2612.
[8]	Yoe, Charles E. Principles of risk analysis decision making under uncertainty(second edition)[M].Boca Raton:Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, 2019.
[9]	SCHMIDT-THOMé P. The spatial effects and management of natural and technological hazards in Europe-espon1.3.1, executive summary[M]. Espoo:Geological Survey of Finland, 2006.
[10]	Kappes M. S., M. Keiler, K. von Elverfeld, et al. Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk:a review[J]. Natural Hazards, 2012, 64(2):1925-1958.
[11]	Marzocchi W., A. Garcia-Aristizabal, P. Gasparini, et al. Basic principles of multi-risk assessment:a case study in Italy[J]. Natural Hazards, 2012,62(2):551-573.
[12]	Mignan A. D7.2 MATRIX-CITY User Manual, New methodologies for multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment methods for Europe[J]. Deliverable, 2013,7(2):78.
[13]	Menoni S, Galderisi A, Ceudech A, et al. FP6 ARMONIA PROJECT-Applied multi-risk mapping of natural hazards for impact assessment[C]//Harmonised Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Methods Informing Mitigation Strategies Addressing Land-Use Planning and Management, 2006.
[14]	Pilone E, Demichela M. A semi-quantitative methodology to evaluate the main local territorial risks and their interactions[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018(77):143-154.
[15]	李虹彬, 刘亚婷, 王卫光, 等. 气候因素对阿克苏河径流变化影响的定量评估[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2021,40(1):115-122.