乡村合作治理模式研究——以成都市战旗村和运城市蒲韩乡村社区为例

Research on Rural Cooperative Governance Model: Taking Zhanqi Village in Chengdu and Puhan Village Cummunity in Yuncheng as Examples

  • 摘要: 在城市化、现代化和全球化的冲击下,新的乡村合作治理模式在实践中涌现。本文基于已有精英分类,充分考察普通村民的上升性和治理主体间的流动性,构建“体制内精英—体制外精英—潜在精英”分析框架,增加“领导型—参与型”维度,以四川省成都市郫都区战旗村和山西省运城市永济市蒲韩乡村社区为比较案例,分析两类主流乡村合作治理模式。研究认为,尽管拥有较强的社会资本,但受历史传统、经济发展等因素影响,不同治理主体拥有的资源及占据地位存在差别,集体经济发展良好、传统政治权威较强的乡村表现为体制内精英主导的自上而下治理模式,集体经济发展滞后、传统政治权威较弱的乡村则表现为体制外精英主导的自下而上治理模式,但均以有效协商、联合行动及共同体构建作为主要治理路径。需根据村庄实际情况选择合适的合作治理模式,提升乡村治理效能,降低治理成本。

     

    Abstract: Under impacts of urbanization, modernization and globalization, new rural elite cooperative governance models have emerged in practice. Based on existing elite classification, this article examines the rise of ordinary villagers and mobility between elites, and constructs an analysis framework of ‘elite within the systemelite outside the system-potential elite’, also in aspects of leader and participant. Two types of rural elite cooperative governance models are further analyzed by taking Zhanqi Village in Chengdu and Puhan Rural Community in Yuncheng as comparative cases. Despite strong social capital, influenced by historical traditions, economic development and other factors, governance resources and status of rural elite groups are different, and different cooperative governance models have developed. Rural areas with strong collective economy and political authority are represented by a top-down model dominated by elites within the system, while areas with weak collective economy and political authority are represented by a bottom-up model dominated by elites outside the system. Even so, effective consultation, joint action and community building function as the main governance paths of elite cooperative governance. In order to improve governance efficiency and reduce costs, it is necessary to choose an appropriate cooperative governance model according to actual situation of the village.

     

/

返回文章
返回