Study on the Participatory Design Model of the Mountainous Traditional Villages in Southern Shaanxi: A Case Study of Zhanjiawan Village in Xunyang County, Ankang City
-
摘要: 陕南山区传统村落因自身条件受限,其保护与发展亟需政府主导和社会力量的共同推进。作为设计方,在村落保护与发展的起步阶段可通过组织“参与式设计”搭建与政府、村民之间的沟通平台,在项目实践过程中发掘相关问题及内在原因,探寻山区传统村落保护与发展的适宜路径。本研究以陕西省安康市旬阳县典型山区传统村落湛家湾村作为试点,推行参与式设计实践并完成了村落保护与更新设计方案。通过对参与式设计过程的总结和反思,提出由初期政府为主导的强干预模式逐渐过渡到以村民为主体的多元参与模式,最终达到依靠村落自组织和内生性力量促进其自发性保护与发展的目标。Abstract: The protection and development of traditional villages in mountainous areas are in urgent need of joint promotion of the government and social forces due to the villages' limited conditions. As designers, in the initial stage of village protection and development, we can build a communication platform with the government and villagers by organizing' participatory design', and explore the appropriate path for the protection and development of traditional villages in mountainous areas. In this study, Zhanjiawan, a traditional village in the typical mountainous area of Southern Shaanxi Province, was taken as a pilot project to carry out participatory design practice and complete the renewal design scheme of the village. Through the summary and reflection of the design process, it is proposed that the initial intervention model dominated by the government in the early stage gradually changes to the multi participation model with the villagers as the main body, and finally achieves the goal of promoting the spontaneous protection and development of the village by relying on the self-organization and endogenous force.
-
Key words:
- traditional village in mountainous area /
- participatory design /
- practice /
- model /
- Zhanjiawan Village
-
[1] Jesper S., Toni R.. Routledge international handbook of participatory design[M].London:Routledge,2012:2. [2] 王彦杰, 陈红宇, 李昕阳. 鼓励与引导并重的村庄规划公众参与实践——以黔东南占里村为例[J]. 小城镇建设,2018,36(7):11-17.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8439.2018.07.002. [3] 李敏敏, 皮永生. 北欧参与式设计对中国设计介入乡村建设的启示[J]. 当代美术家,2019(1):60-63. [4] 高巍, 胡敏, 靳晓娟. 基于角色参与的当前中国乡村建设模式分析[J]. 城市发展研究,2019,26(3):21-27. [5] 镇列评,蔡佳琪,兰菁.多元主体视角下我国参与式乡村规划模式比较研究[J]. 小城镇建设,2017,35(12):38-43.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8439.2017.12.005 [6] 张天新. 关于乡村规划与参与式设计[J]. 北京规划建设, 2018(5):157-158. [7] 王宏刚. 偏远古村落文化遗产保护的动力机制研究[M]//民族遗产(第二辑). 北京:学苑出版社,2009:66-74. [8] 段德罡,桂春琼,黄梅.村庄"参与式规划"的路径探索——岜扒村的实践与反思[J]. 上海城市规划,2018(6):35-41. [9] 苏童, 王宇, 饶祖林. 乡村振兴, 我们在路上——设计介入乡村的实践思考[J]. 中国勘察设计,2018(7):20-28. [10] 林瀚, 郭怡清. 偏远型乡村的主题式规划路径探索——以瑶安乡田心村为例[C]//中国城市规划学会. 共享与品质——2018中国城市规划年会论文集. 北京:中国城市规划学会, 2018:621-631. [11] 吴志宏, 吴雨桐, 石文博. 内生动力的重建:新乡土逻辑下的参与式乡村营造[J]. 建筑学报,2017(2):108-113. [12] 徐辰, 杨槿. 社区参与视角下的乡村规划过程与模式实践[J]. 规划师,2019,35(1):88-93. [13] 孙君, 廖星臣. 农理——乡村建设实践与理论研究[M]. 北京:中国轻工业出版社,2014:208. [14] 孙朝阳, 隋欣, 金东来. 以营造社为视角的乡村在地营建协同机制研究[J]. 大连民族大学学报,2017,19(3):248-252. [15] 程大立. 传统村落村(居)民议事制度的优化与创新[J]. 农村经济与科技,2019(7):216-219. [16] 郐艳丽. 我国传统村落保护制度的反思与创新[J]. 现代城市研究,2016(1):2-9. [17] 王晓, 张立铭. 基于农村普通传统民居保护的一户一宅相关政策改进研究[J]. 建筑与文化,2019(9):166-168. [18] 沈娉, 张尚武. 从单一主体到多元参与:公共空间微更新模式探析[J]. 城市规划学刊,2019(3):103-110.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 181
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0