Research on the Coordinated Development Path of Science and Innovation City and Characteristic Town Based on Urban-rural Integration: Taking the Area around Chaohu Lake as an Example
-
摘要: 当前,我国科技创新发展战略主要聚焦于大中型城市,偏向大中型城市的创新政策将会造成创新要素在城乡之间分配不平等、城乡差距扩大。城乡科技创新的协同有助于城乡之间创新要素的流动、减少城乡差距,但乡村受制于产业基础薄弱、与城市空间障碍大等原因,较难与城市形成创新协同。特色小镇是科创城市与乡村的联结点,特色小镇与科创城市协同发展,有助于辐射带动乡村发展,促进城乡融合和社会公平。科创城市与特色小镇的协同路径包括空间互补联动、产业协同布局、功能复合开发等。本研究以安徽省环巢湖区域为例,分析了科创城市与特色小镇协同的先决条件,探究了科创城市与特色小镇的协同发展路径,以期为今后特色小镇的发展提供一定的参考。Abstract: At present, China's scientific and technological innovation development strategy mainly focuses on large and medium-sized cities. The innovation policy biased towards large and medium-sized cities will lead to the unequal distribution of innovation elements between urban and rural areas and the widening gap between urban and rural areas. The synergy of urban and rural scientific and technological innovation can help the flow of innovation elements between urban and rural areas and reduce the gap between urban and rural areas. However, due to the weak industrial foundation and large obstacles with urban space, it is difficult for rural areas to form innovation synergy with cities. Characteristic towns are the connection point between science and innovation cities and villages. The coordinated development of characteristic towns and science and innovation cities will help radiate and drive rural development, promote urban-rural integration and social equity. The collaborative path between science and innovation cities and characteristic towns includes spatial complementary linkage, industrial collaborative layout, functional compound development, etc. Taking the area around Chaohu Lake as an example, this study analyzes the preconditions for the synergy between science and innovation city and characteristic town, and explores the coordinated development path between science and innovation city and characteristic town, in order to provide some reference for the development of characteristic town in the future.
-
[1] 住房和城乡建设部,国家发展和改革委员会,财政部.关于开展特色小镇培育工作的通知(建村[2016] 147号)[Z],2016. [2] 麻玉琦,任少波.交易成本与城市载体型产业空间的形成——以浙江省特色小镇为例[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(7):127-132. [3] 刘继为.特色小镇研究的现状、热点与趋势——基于CNKI和CiteSpace的可视化分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(8):107-117. [4] 罗必良.缩小城乡收入差距的城镇化战略[J].农村经济, 2013(1):9-11. [5] 孙文秀,武前波.新科技革命下知识型城市空间组织的转型与重构[J].城市发展研究,2019,26(8):62-70. [6] 王建廷,申慧娟.京津冀协同发展中心区域特色小镇建设路径研究[J].城市发展研究,2018,25(5):7-12. [7] 郝华勇.湖北省特色小镇培育路径及对策研究[J].湖北社会科学,2018(3):90-95. [8] 孟庆莲.都市圈协同发展视角下特色小镇的规范健康发展:功能、挑战及其发展路径[J].行政管理改革,2021(11):74-80. [9] 郭峰,黄杨,袁瑞佳.创新协同视角下特色小镇竞争力提升机理与对策研究[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(20):182-187. [10] 谢涤湘,王哲.产城融合背景下的科技小镇发展机制研究——以惠州潼湖科技小镇为例[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(9):25-29. [11] 刘国斌,高英杰,王福林.中国特色小镇发展现状及未来发展路径研究[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(6):98-107. [12] 李国英.构建都市圈时代"核心城市+特色小镇"的发展新格局[J].区域经济评论,2019(6):117-125. [13] 朱伯伦."大城小镇"协同发展影响因素与路径——基于浙江特色小镇建设的实证研究[J].学术论坛,2018,41(1):116-121. [14] 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[M].北京:人民出版社,2021. [15] 刘清春,刘淑芳,马永欢.创新水平对中国城乡收入差距的影响研究——基于工具变量回归模型[J].软科学,2016,30(9):11-14. [16] H.哈肯.协同学[M].徐锡申,陈试刚,陈雅深,等,译.北京:原子能出版社,1984. [17] 侯永志,张永生,刘培林,等.区域协同发展:机制与政策[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2016. [18] 方叶林,黄震方,李经龙,等.中国特色小镇的空间分布及其产业特征[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(6):1273-1284. [19] 谢宏,李颖灏,韦有义.浙江省特色小镇的空间结构特征及影响因素研究[J].地理科学,2018,38(8):1283-1291. [20] 张思蒙,李宪宝.我国特色小镇空间分布特征及其区域影响因素[J].资源开发与市场,2018,34(8):1074-1079. [21] 周子航,张京祥."试错"与"先验":应对创新的土地供给困境与规划响应[J].城市规划学刊,2021(5):110-117. [22] 黄莉.城市功能复合:模式与策略[J].热带地理,2012,32(4):402-408. [23] 巢湖市人民政府.巢湖[EB/OL].(2021-09-07)[2022-01-05]. http://www.chaohu.gov.cn/wzq/zfgbmwzdh/swlj/qyly/mlch/fjms/10076545.html. [24] 合肥市科技局.合肥环巢湖科技创新走廊建设规划[Z], 2017. -

计量
- 文章访问数: 55
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0