Research on the Revitalization of JinHua Traditional Villages Based on "Revitalizing Historic Buildings through Partnership Scheme"
-
摘要: 村落是最初人类生命的聚居地,传统村落的活化更新一直伴随着保护与更新两种声音,各类社会群体一边呼吁保留文化遗存,扶持其文物保育,一边又为了传统村落如何活化更新,创造利益价值而殚精竭虑。传统村落的保护与更新是否可以并存?传统村落的保护与更新规划难以落实,其中一个很重要的原因是其运营模式、制度保障、资金保证、公众参与体系的不够完善。文章基于香港“活化历史建筑伙伴计划”,以蓝屋建筑群的活化计划为例,分析该计划在传统建筑保护与更新实施方面的创新,并进一步提出该计划对浙江省金华市传统村落保护实施策略带来的启示。
-
关键词:
- 传统村落 /
- 活化保护 /
- 更新策略 /
- 活化历史建筑伙伴计划
Abstract: Villages are the original settlements of human lives. The activation and renewal of traditional villages have always been accompanied by the two different voices, which are protection and renewal. All kinds of social groups are calling for the preservation of cultural relics and supporting the conservation of cultural relics. In the meanwhile, they are all worried about how to activate and renew the traditional villages and create benefits. Could the protection and renewal of traditional villages coexist? The implement of traditional villages' protection and renewal planning is difficult, of which one of the important reasons is that the operation mode, system guarantee, fund guarantee and public participation are not perfect enough. Based on the introduction of "Revitalizing Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme" in Hong Kong, taking the revitalization plan of Blue House occupant as an example, this paper analyzes the innovation of the revitalization plan in the protection and renovation of traditional buildings, and puts forward the enlightenment of this plan on the protection and implementation strategy of the local traditional villages in Jinhua City. -
[1] 北京大学旅游研究与规划中心.旅游规划与设计——传统村落保护与活化[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015. [2] 罗德胤.传统村落:从观念到实践[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2017. [3] 萧加,王鲁湘.中国传统村落图典[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2018. [4] 王琚,周亚琦.香港"活化历史建筑伙伴计划"及其启示[J].规划师,2011,27(4):73-76. [5] Cody J W. Heritage as Hologram:Hong Kong After a Change in Sovereignty,1997-2001[M]//Logan WS, eds. The Disappearing "Asian" City:Protecting Asia's Urban Heritage in a Globalizing World (Asian Cultural Heritage). London:Oxford University Press,2004. [6] 陈芷筠.基于"活化历史建筑伙伴计划"的香港唐楼建筑保育活化研究[J].广东科技,2016,25(10):43-46. [7] 郎嵬,李郇,陈婷婷.从社会因素角度评估香港城市更新模式的可持续性[J].国际城市规划,2018,33(6):63-67. [8] Strange I, Whitney D. The Changing Roles and Purposes of Heritage Conservation in the UK[J]. Planning, Practice&Research, 2003,18(2-3):219-229. [9] Yung E H K, Chan E H W, Xu Y. Assessing the Social Impact of Revitalising Historic Buildings on Urban Renewal:The Case of a Local Participatory Mechanism[J]. Journal of Design Research,2015,13(2):125-149. [10] Atkinson R. Commentary:Gentrification, Segregation and the Vocabulary of Affluent Residential Choice[J]. Urban Studies, 2008,45(12):2626-2636. [11] 西村幸夫.再造魅力故乡——日本传统街区重生故事[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007. [12] 陈统奎.再看桃米:台湾社区营造的草根实践[J].南风窗,2011(17):58-61. [13] 张雨薇,范文兵.在地的建筑:乡村营造的几种路径分析[J].建筑与文化,2019(1):172-174. -

计量
- 文章访问数: 4435
- HTML全文浏览量: 229
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0